A few months ago, we covered Inkit, Inc. v. Airslate, Inc., C.A. No. 23-793-RGA (D. Del. Mar. 26, 2025).
As a brief refresher, that case dealt with a claim that airSlate breached a settlement agreement resolving a trademark dispute. In filing the complaint, Inkit included an almost totally unredacted version of the settlement agreement, which had a confidentiality provision. Accordingly, airSlate counterclaimed for breach of the confidentiality provision.
At the time the Court had ruled on summary judgment that all the elements of breach were proven except for damages (naturally a pretty tough thing to prove in this situation absent an actual settlement offer from another party asking for the …
